Circle of Midwives
The
Circle of Midwives is a beginning at creating a structure and paradigm
for midwives as a group to acknowledge our diversity, honor it,
and realize we can find out unity as well.
The
unity would be based on two points. The first is that every pregnant
woman has a right to choose her caregiver when given relevant information
with which to make that decision.
Public
education about midwifery and individual disclosure of training,
experience, statistics, and affiliations could be the basis of informed
client choices about caregivers.
The
second point of unity is that midwives I've talked to are called
to serve. Each has been called to serve in their own way. It is
functional for us to practice in different ways. There are so many
different people with different beliefs and needs who all have babies!
A surplus of mothers and babies will not die if we do not all follow
the same calling or guidelines in our service.

Having
categories of midwives need not be seen as yet another division
between us. It merely acknowledges the diversity which already
exists. Perhaps some groups are not highly represented in MANA-
yet. Perhaps part of why they are not members of MANA is that is
has been increasingly projecting an image of professional midwife
as the standard against which we all will be judged. By
seriously exploring the possibility of a model like the Circle of
Midwives, MANA could acknowledge that there really could be multiple
safe and effective modes of belief and practice of midwifery.
Each
section of the Circle of Midwives would form its own volition and
choice. There would not have to be a specific number of sections-
a blank spot is left to indicate the possibility of new forms of
midwifery to develop and enter the Circle. The sections I've named
are merely possibilities for illustration.
Each
section would set up its own standards and core competencies. Each
section would have represented on a council which would promote
knowledge of and relations between the sections. Statistics from
each section could be submitted to illustrate the safety of each
section. Effective methods of different sections could be elucidated
so those who wished to add them to their repertoire could more easily
do so. So far, MANA has begun to do this for the professional midwife
only.
We
can create a form for acknowledging midwifery knowledge and wisdom
of many sorts. MANA can open more fully to all midwives. Customary
professional validation is exclusionary and eventually leads to
stagnation. Instead, let's empower ourselves as we are and affirm
our clients' rights to choose who will serve them.
|